BAGGAGE CHECK

Baggage Check: Health Care Characters

Dr. Andrea Bonior dives into the world of psychology.

Dr. Andrea BoniorWOULD YOU FEEL as comfortable with the person who's performing your eye surgery if you knew he or she had a love affair with Coors Light?

Would you want to know if the person analyzing your bloodwork — and telling you whether or not your low sex drive is indicative of a hormonal problem — seems to think of women primarily as sex objects?

A new study in the Journal of the American Medical Association explores the modern and uncharted territory of physicians letting too much hang out online.

What are appropriate boundaries and safeguards to enact when it comes to the distinction between personal and private lives?

Most troubling, the question seems to have not made its way into most medical school curricula: the majority of institutions who participated in the survey, while acknowledging problems that have arisen with their students' online identities, do not have formal policies in place that govern online conduct.

Does this mean that the character of doctors is any different now than it's been before?

Of course not.

Health care providers — I'll be the first to admit — were human before, and are human now.

And there are even some bad apples in the bunch.

But most likely, the only thing that's changed is how easy it is, as patients, to find out all sorts of these foibles with the click of a mouse, and how tempting it is for physicians to expose them.

As Dr. Katherine C. Chretian, a local physician who co-authored the study, points out, that's a problem that should no longer be ignored.

ALSO IN BAGGAGE CHECK
COMMENTS (1)
  • I have two comments on this post. "That's a problem that can no longer be ignored" as Dr. Bonior states, was not actually stated by Dr. Chretian in the referenced article, and I think for good reason. It is impossible to gage the magnitude of the issue (what Dr. Chretian actually called it) to actually label it as a problem. Sure there are some numbers from a survey that was conducted, but even the referenced article indicated there is bias within their study. Whether the issue is regarding 5 or 500 medical students I think is irrelevant, and that the focus of the article is that the medical community has been made aware of an issue that has not be addressed previously to adequately keep up social trends. I know I’ve posted this type of comment before, but Dr. Bonior should really separate her expert opinion from those of the people she’s referencing (although I should point out, I am inclined to agree that “problem” is probably the correct label). My second thought on this subject is that this issue shouldn’t be narrowed in scope to only look at medical students. Would we feel any different with a civil engineer building bridges that has a love affair with Coors Light than a doctor? Or a judge…. teacher…. police officer?

    By Tony , Posted September 24, 2009 7:59 AM
POST A COMMENT
All comments on Express' blogs will be screened for appropriateness, spam and topic relevance, so there is likely to be a delay before your comment is displayed. Thanks for your patience.

Remember personal info?
(you may use HTML tags for style)